Calumet College of Saint Joseph

Education Program

Fall Semester 2003-2004

Education 430: Educating Exceptional Students

 

Syllabus

 

Dr. Stuart Swenson

Assistant Professor in Education

 

Office:              Room 300

Hours:              Tuesday 12:00 - 4:00, Wednesday 9:00 – 4:00, and by appointment

Telephone:            Home: 219-865-3306

                        Office: 219-473-4271

E-mail:              sswenson@ccsj.edu

                        Swenson@jorsm.com

Course time:            Mon – Thur. 8:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m., Sept. 15 to October 2

 

Course Description

Teacher candidates will explore the physical, psychological and social nature of the various exceptionalities described in the Federal special education law.  Also included is the process of identification, diagnosis, education and treatment focusing on the continuum of services.  A critical aspect of this course includes the problems in special education labeling and programming which every serious student must deal with before engaging in the classroom.  These issues will be applied to every topic throughout the course.

 

Prerequisites: EDU 100, 200, 300, 311, 342 and 370

 

Principal Objectives:

The teacher candidate will gain knowledge, through reflection and practical experiences with the following concepts associated with meeting the educational needs of students with diverse capabilities and from diverse backgrounds:

 

Ø      Characteristics of diverse students and their families

Ø      Legal aspects of providing educational services

Ø      Instructional planning and accommodations in the social and educational environments to facilitate learning

Ø      Individual differences and assessment

Ø      Problems with putting the special education endeavor into practice

 

Related INTASC Principles:

Ø      Principle 2: The teacher understands how children learn and develop, and can provide learning opportunities that support their intellectual, social and personal development.

Ø      Principle 3: The teacher understands how students differ in their approaches to learning and creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners.

Ø      Principle 4: The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students’ development of critical thinking, problem solving and performance skills.

 

Textbook:

Vaughn, S., Boss, C.S. and Schumm, J.S. (2003). Teaching Exceptional, Diverse and At-Risk Students in the General Education Classroom, Third Edition.  Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Other materials (to be provided):

Live Learn Work Play (courtesy of the Hammond Public Schools)

Selected journal articles to be integrated into every aspect of the course.

 

Attendance:

Attendance is mandatory and is included in the participation grade.  Furthermore, such variables as attendance, participation, appearance and attitude are all included in the second aspect, “disposition” in the INTASC principles.  Students need to consider all three aspects of each of the INTASC principles to be learned: knowledge, disposition and performance.

 

Classes:

The following topics will be covered during each of the classroom sessions.  Textbook readings will coincide with each category, but because the classes are not necessarily organized in terms of the textbook, students will find sections of a chapter covered on one day, and other sections covered on another day.

 

September 15:             Learning from special education Internet sources

 

September 16 and 17:             Working with disabled children: the thin blue line;

                                    Purpose of special education (IDEA, paragraph 300.1) and the new language of rehabilitation and special education (Pledger, 2003; Text pp. 2-8); prevalence (p. 21)

 

September 18:             Problems of special education: reviewing the literature

 

September 22:             Communication disorders and learning disability

 

September 23:             Mental retardation/developmental disability

 

September 24:              Pervasive developmental disorders and Emotional/behavioral disturbance

 

September 25:             Visual impairment,  Hard of Hearing/Deaf impairment

 

September 29:             Physical disabilities

 

September 30:              Other health impaired: ADHD/ADD, Traumatic brain injury, teaching the margins

 

October 1:                    Assessment and Identification, Legal Issues

 

October 2:                    Legal Issues (continued)

 

Each student will receive a copy of the grading rubric before the class, but it will be available at any time to the student who may have misplaced it or erased it from the e-mail. 

 

Ø      Before the 10 unit lectures, there will be a pretest based on the reading for the week.  Following each unit, a posttest, consisting of 5 questions per chapter, will follow.  There will be no final exam, but the posttest points are cumulative, totaling 50 points.  Posttest performance will account for 25% of the course grade.

 

Ø      Attendance/participation will account for 15% of the course grade. 

 

Ø      Ten hours of field experiences are required in this class.  We assume that two classroom observations, accounting for 10% of the grade will account for those experiences.  Students are required to use the Ysseldyke teaching effectiveness criteria to evaluate the quality of instruction.  This document will be due by the last day of the class at the latest.

 

Ø      50% of the grade will be based on the “Happy Valley Parent Handbook”, an assignment that student teams (of 2) will do as a process assignment during the course.   The final copy is due the last day of class.  The full explanation of the assignment and its conditions will be made available during class, but students with active e-mail accounts will receive an electronic copy.  Students are encouraged to apply the materials from the lectures and readings to the final product.  While this document may be similar to the one found in school districts, it will be unique, in that it will serve as a “caveat emptor”, or “buyer beware” to consumers and teachers, designed to prevent the negative consequences of special education, secondary to the problems inherent in special education created by law and the continuing practice of destructive and self-defeating practices.

 

The final document will reveal not only student knowledge, but the degree to which student teams have reflected on the content of the course and understand its purpose.  The final grade will be determined by how well students show their understanding of the content and how well they have thought through the difficulties of identification, assessment, placement and programming of special education, not just their understanding of legal issues.  Unfortunately, many people have understood special education only as legal compliance: once legal compliance has been attained, quality programming is in place.  While good programming involves legal compliance, our current understanding of the field shows that teachers must understand much much more, namely an appreciation of the importance of teaching and the value of persons.

 

 

ACADEMIC DISHONESTY:

If an instructor or other Calumet College of St. Joseph personnel find that a student has plagiarized or been involved in another form of academic dishonesty, the instructor or other personnel may elect to bring the matter up for judicial review.  The maximum penalty for any form of academic dishonesty is dismissal from the College.  Dismissal from the college becomes a metaphor of what the student is doing to him/herself relative to the community at large, and is done to send the difficult but necessary message to the person that such behavior left unchecked destroys and alienates the person from society.  The procedures for judicial review are listed under the section of CCSJ handbook that addresses student grievances.

 

The issue of academic integrity is especially critical in the educational cohorts.  Students who engage in deceitful tactics are usually known by their peers, a situation which places everyone in the class in a vulnerable position and subtly implicates them in the offense.  In essence, those engaging in academic dishonesty place the entire program, including the collective morale, at risk, not just themselves.  If any student has any questions about any ethical issue, including the proper management of information, that person is encouraged to discuss the matter with this instructor or, indeed, anyone on the faculty until he/she is fully satisfied with how to proceed in the matter.

 

WITHDRAWAL FROM CLASSES POLICY:

After the last day for class changes has passed (see College calendar), students may withdraw from a course in which they are registered with permission from the faculty member conducting the course.  A written request detailing the reason(s) for the withdrawal must be filed with the Registrar.  The Registrar must receive written request for withdrawal by the last day of classes prior to the final examination dates specified in the catalogue.  Written requests may be mailed to the Registrar or faxed to the College. … Dropping the course without written permission automatically incurs an “F” grade for the course.  (See refund schedule).