• Shavings Home
  • Contact
  • CCSJ Home
  • CCSJ Email
  • Blackboard

The Student Newspaper of Calumet College of St. Joseph

  • Home
  • Special Editions
    • In-Depth
    • Humanities Festival
    • Graduation Issue
  • Campus
  • News
  • Sports
    • CCSJ Athletics
    • Pro Sports
    • College Sports
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Weekly Wave

Breaking

Dreamcatcher Creates Sweet Dreams at Concord Music Hall

A.C.E Kicks Off Their Under Cover Tour in Chicago

Motion Picture Soundtracks: The Underrated Enhancers

Jay Park Heats Up Chicago During His Sexy 4eva Tour

Disney+ recapturing fans with the classics


Some Religions Don’t Allow for Standing during the National Anthem

8 Comments
 01 Dec 2017   Posted by Chante'l Johnson


With the controversy of kneeling for the national anthem at a fever pitch, it made me think about other people who never stood for the national anthem.

For decades, religious groups such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses have never stood for the national anthem, and it has never caused the type of controversy we see today.

Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t believe in idolizing things such as flags and songs; their beliefs put God first and nothing comes before.

When talking with Willie L. Johnson Jr.–who is a Jehovah’s Witness along with the rest of his family–he expressed how standing for the pledge and the national anthem could be viewed as “disrespectful to God by putting something man made before him (God).”

Johnson considers the flag to be an idol. After quoting the first line of the Pledge of Allegiance, He explains that “I pledge my allegiance to the United States of America and to the republic.” In other words, “what you are saying that you are giving your all to this country and willing to put it before anything.” He says he refuses to stand for something like that.

When asked if he’s ever encountered people who tell him to stand up when the national anthem is played, Johnson replied that he has “never received any backlash until the controversy started last year.” Once he explains why he doesn’t stand, he is left alone.

Johnson also mentioned that he never had any complaints from his childrens’ teachers about them not standing for the national anthem or the pledge.

“It’s our religion and it should be respected just like anybody else who chooses a different religion,” Johnson said. “It’s not about disrespecting the flag; its about not disrespecting our Jehovah and putting a flag or an anthem before him.”

That said, I was drawn to the question, “Does America show greater deference toward an individual’s religious beliefs than his or her personal beliefs?

Yes, freedom of religion is in the Constitution. But so is the right to a peaceful protest.

So why does it seem that one is viewed differently than the other?

Why should a person be attacked because they believe that they and others are being treated unfairly in this country?

Why should a person stand for an anthem and swear a pledge that says that we are supposed to be united as one while at the same time people with darker colored skin aren’t made to feel welcome to visit cities in Indiana like Martinsville or certain parts of the country? Is that really freedom?

Why should a person stand when a person of darker color has their hands up and still is being shot down and killed, but nothing happens to the officers but paid leave? Is this what the “land of the free” looks like?

Of course, this is not to say that religious views should be disrespected equally. Instead, as Americans, we have to stop attacking those with different beliefs than our own, whether they be religious or personal. We need to start listening, healing and changing what is wrong in the first place. American is hurting at a time that we should be coming together we are being divided because people are not listening and not taking the time to at least try to understand either side, or just respecting the opinions of others.

Colin Kaepernick’s protest was never about disrespecting the soldiers or disrespecting this great nation. It’s about the lack of respect that people in this country have for people of darker skin.  It’s about the fact that our own president can call those marching alongside white nationalists in Charleston “good people” but a football player kneeling to raise awareness about racial injustice a “Son of a B.”

If we are not going to disrespect the people who sit down for the flag because of their religion belief, then we shouldn’t disrespect the people who kneel for a peaceful protest.

    Share This

Written by Chante'l Johnson


Related Posts


Student-Veteran at CCSJ Says There’s No Debate: You Must Stand for the National Anthem
December 1, 2017

To Stand or Not to Stand, That’s the Question Concerning the National Anthem
December 1, 2017

Even among African-Americans, National Anthem Debate Not Clear-Cut
December 1, 2017



8 Comments

Lorena
1 year ago

(Reply)



What? As a Jehovah Witness I always stand up out of respect. My daughter always stood up in class but did not recite the Pledge. I have not known any other JW’s that don’t stand.

    Clotho
    9 months ago

    (Reply)



    My in-laws are all Jehovah’s Witnesses, most of them did not stand for the Pledge of Allegiance either.

Judy F Bales
1 year ago

(Reply)



Chante’l, I have been struggling with some of the issues that you bring up in your article in your college’s student newspaper. I am decades older than you, but I appreciate your writing talent, your analyzation of rights we Americans have and the questions you bring up concerning religious freedom as opposed to personal opinions and why these are treated differently. The article is so well written, and am going to share it on Facebook. I assume that it is ok to share as the share button appears at the end of the article. If you see this comment, I would like to hear your opinion of me sharing it. I will share it tomorrow, hopefully after I hear from you.

Forrest Smith
1 year ago

(Reply)



I’m troubled by many parts of the pledge. The founding fathers never wrote about or implied that pledges or oaths by citizens and state government would guarantee the unification of the 13 colonies of the new nation. In addition, the required pledge to the flag and the USA can be interpreted that the citizens are routinely in rebellion– with no allegiance to flag and government–and must repeatedly make the pledge to assure continuous allegiance. Nazi Germany invoked other similar oaths of allegiance. Following the U.S. Civil War, the government in Washington, D.C. pushed for the requirement Confederate soldiers and citizens of the Rebellion to pledge their loyalty to the USA and federal government. The South argued that as citizens born in the U.S. the pledge of loyalty was intrinsic to their citizenship in the nation, thus rendering meaningless a verbal pledge. “Indivisible” is in response to the South’s succession from the U.S. The Constitution is silent on the topic of state succession from the federal government. Within the first decade of the Nation’s birth, Northeastern states above New York made plans to split to become another nation, and the founding fathers did not object based on the Constitution. Later Andrew Jackson strongly opposed succession, and stated repeatedly that the U.S.A. was “indivisible” and viewed succession as rebellion, even with no Constitutional evidence or case law to support him.. Abraham Lincoln worked with Jackson and strongly supported the same beliefs. Other troubling statements in the pledge have led me to stand with arms at my side, in silence. The pledge is baked deeply in the DNA of our country, but it’s value needs to be analyzed using historical evidence in order to support it, or retire it to our past history.

Will
1 year ago

(Reply)



I believe the good people comment was aimed at the people of Charlottesville not Charleston.

Darrell
11 months ago

(Reply)



Witnesses will always stand to show a proper respect for the views of others. They will not however participate in the recital (vowing of an oath ) or salutes.
The bible(Jehovah’s book of instructions to mankind) speaks against such things.
As our creator ,the one who knows all our intricate parts and how to make the best use of them , he certainly has the right to give us loving guidance and warnings for protection as any loving father reasonably would .

tiffany
11 months ago

(Reply)



I heard a guy on youtube make a good point, saying we are being forced to compromise our beliefs to compensate for other’s. The guy also pointed out that people are being taken to court on the account that other’s don’t agree with them, and freedom of speak, freedom of religion is almost nonexistent anymore. I don’t believe in flag salute but I will be respectful of those that do and with the respect that I have shown, it should also be given in return, but sadly that’s not how the majority of the world sees it, but if they did the world they may achieve some of the peace that they’ve been striving for instead of causing divisions amongst those that have different points of view and opinions

Tech Blog
3 months ago

(Reply)



Your post is great. I linked your blog on my Twitter. I hope my visitors will fancy your articles as well.
Would love to read more from you!



Leave a Reply to Clotho Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Recent Posts

    • Dreamcatcher Creates Sweet Dreams at Concord Music Hall
      December 15, 2019
    • A.C.E Kicks Off Their Under Cover Tour in Chicago
      December 6, 2019
    • Motion Picture Soundtracks: The Underrated Enhancers
      December 4, 2019
    • Jay Park Heats Up Chicago During His Sexy 4eva Tour
      November 29, 2019
    • Disney+ recapturing fans with the classics
      November 27, 2019
  • Find us on Facebook

  • Popular Posts

    • Some Religions Don't Allow for Standing during the National Anthem
      December 1, 2017
    • Baseball Leads to Friendly Relations between Two Rival Countries
      March 29, 2016
    • Creating a Home Away from Home for CCSJ's International Students
      December 19, 2016
  • Photo in News

  • Archives

    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • July 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • May 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • July 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • May 2015
    • February 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • June 2014


  • Mission Statement

    Our mission is to report the college news in a balanced way, give students practice in the fields of journalism and newspaper design, and to provide a forum to help build a strong college community.

    The Shavings is looking for writers! If you are interested in writing for The Shavings, please contact the Editor, Hannah Carr, or the Advisor, Professor Cassello.

  • Staff

    President:
    Amy McCormack, Ph.D.
    Faculty Advisors:
    Mark Cassello
    Michael Puente
    Managing Editor:
    Hannah Carr
    Staff:
    Shelbey Collins
    Robert Davis
    Anthony DelValle
    Andrea Doughty
    Taylor Elizondo
    Emily Gomez
    Ivan Miranda

  • Find us on Facebook

  • Contact

    Calumet College of St. Joseph
    ATTN: The Shavings
    2400 New York Ave.
    Whiting, IN 46394

    Office : (219) 473-4322
    Email : mcassello@ccsj.edu or hcarr@ccsj.edu


© 2018 Copyright Calumet College of St. Joseph. All Rights Reserved